When do images have a purely utilitarian function? Reading through Edward Tufte’s Envisioning Information (an incredible book that I recommend to virtually every social scientist, available on Amazon.com here and via the author’s site here. Really. The images are nice, but his writing is fantastic), I came across a series of railway tables:
As Tufte notes, the image is busy, complicated, and difficult to read. Yet it also encodes a massive amount of information. Certainly for the railway operators it served a very utilitarian purpose. I think most would say, however, that these facts detract from its aesthetic quality.
What I find interesting in these visuals is the fact that I can honestly say I have no idea what is going on. I mean, really no idea.
But it obviously served a purpose for someone. So if it doesn’t serve a utilitarian purpose for me, then I guess it may be closer to purely aesthetic, i.e. closer to art than we first admitted. So lets look at more conventional rail maps:
(China Railway Timetable, Railway Ministry of the People’s Republic of China (Beijing, April 1985), index 4. “The numbers along the route lines are page numbers, showing where to look up the detailed schedule for that route.” In Tufte 1990)
Again, via Tufte (1990) we see another map with a similarly clear function (finding our way around China), but a less clear utilitarian form. It reminds me of certain tree maps that I have featured in earlier posts as visual masterpieces. So what’s going on here?
Here’s Seoul‘s metro map. It is also very busy, but now colorful, and kind of…well, artistic. It serves a function, guiding us through the city, but also captures our attention and engages us.
In a data visualization project I was involved with while working at the Midwest High Speed Rail Association, I kind of dealt with this issue by adding another dimension to the lines: color (for railway continuity), size of dots (for city hub size), and line thickness (for importance/usage). This just encoded more information in the image…but did not make it any more difficult to read.
(Difficult to read. Operation diagram for 12:00 noon, July 25, 1985, Tokaido and Sanyo Shinkansen Lines (bullet train), Japanese National Railroad control room, Tokyo. In Tufte 1990)
Thinking about that information-encoding conundrum, maybe its just a question of audience, in that some of these maps are for individuals who are acclimated to their form of visual data encoding, and some are for an audience that needs to access them for travel purposes. Simple. But I think there is also an element of art. Consider Da Vinci’s anatomy sketches: in one sense, they are really just a technical manual for dissection, although most viewers today approach them as pure art.
(via Goodart.org. Visit them for a good source of classical images of the human form)
In the same sense, flipping through an issue of Science and similar journals yields some pretty esoteric–and rather artistic–images:
That are nonetheless functional and utilitarian to others.
Just something to think about.
Mathur et al. 2010. A Transient Niche Regulates the Specification of Drosophila Intestinal Stem Cells. Science 327(5962): 210–213. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2857772/.
Tufte, Edward. 1990. Envisioning Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
(Images reproduced without permission from author or publisher. Neither this blog nor its authors are associated with original author or publisher. Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 107 this blog reproduces the above images for commentary and scholarship purposes–this is an educational blog and is intended to act as a resource for individuals interested in its stated educational mission. If the original author, publisher, or copyright holder of the above images finds issue with their reproduction, please contact us and we will immediately remove them from our blog. Otherwise, they are reproduced with links to a site or sites where visitors may purchase the material, because we do really think they are worth owning. Thanks!)